“And above all, watch with glittering eyes the whole world around you because the greatest secrets are always hidden in the most unlikely places.”―
Over the years we all have had cause to complain to the Word Press administrators that our editorial content has been plagiarized by a fellow blogger and probably asked them to assist us with this issue.
The question that partner Susan and myself is asking here is: what if there is more to it than mere plagiarism? What if foreign nationals are encrypting our innocent blog articles and turning them into envoys of espionage destined to be read ONLY by an audience given an encryption key?
Encryption is a way of scrambling data so that only authorized parties can understand the information. In technical terms, it is the process of converting plaintext to ciphertext.
In simpler terms, encryption takes readable data and alters it so that it appears random. Encryption requires the use of an encryption key: a set of mathematical values that both the sender and the recipient of an encrypted message know.
In essence an innocuous article’s copy about an apothecary in a small town in England could be transformed into a double layered message containing more valuable information to anyone with the necessary electronic key.
It turns out that Go Daddy ( based in the United States) is simply the registrar of the questionable site name. Go Daddy does not host the site and just like Word Press has “no jurisdiction ” over its content.
Susan discovered that the broadband provider is the Hong Kong Broadband Network. With a lot more investigation she discovered that and it turns out the network is Hong Kong based and owned by Hong Kong Television.
Using the IP address she attempted to gain more information from it, but unfortunately drew a blank.
We even spent time going through the IP addresses of those that have communicated with us in the hope we might spot the address. Still no luck with that endeavor.
The crux of the matter is this: the site in question is puzzling. It is difficult to the figure out the point of this site. Is it a front for something else? There is no Home Page, No Likes section, not even any slight information about the owner.
Neither is there any introduction or explanation about the site. And when you Click to read Previous Comments you are directed away from the site to a separate News site. So, why would you copy all those posts if it wasn’t to have feed back.
These are a few of the puzzling questions being pondered here. I do not know how many more parts to this series will involve but more information and details will be published as they are uncovered.
In the meantime feel free to give us your opinion on this controversial topic. It is an election year in the United States and such clandestine activity should be noted on and acted upon.
This could also be a false alarm and no one really wants to shout fire for no reason.
As the expression goes: See something. Say something.